I met the coolest person the other day. Her name is Noa. That's right. Like Noah, but without the H. We instantly bonded. We created our own secret Noa/h handshake that no one else knows and we are now officially BFF. Times 10.

I also met someone named Catherine F. a few weeks ago at school. We were both taking a Gender and Society class over the summer. The teacher was talking about how King James altered the Bible over the years by picking and choosing what Gospels to include and which ones to take out. Catherine immediately raised her hand and questioned this notion:
"Are you saying that the Bible was radically different before King James?"
The teacher responded yes, saying that he left out certain Gnostic Gospels which told a different story of Jesus. Catherine's response?
"But you do realize the so called Gnostic Gospels were written in the second century, almost two hundred years after the death of Christ, while the Gospels that were included originally were written within 70-80 years of Christ's life still in the first century?"
The teacher says, well that is an argument some opponents use. Excuse me? Argument? There is no argument when it comes to fact. The New Testament is one the THE most reliable religious and historical sources. The fact that the books were written within 80 years of the events that happened makes it nearly foil-proof. Other works of the time, Plato and Homer, were not found or translated until 500 years after the fact, and yet they are considered to be accurate and untainted.
After the whole ordeal, I wrote Catherine a short note saying that she was completely right and kudos for her for speaking out against what the teacher was clearly uneducated on. The next week, she thanked me for the note and we had a nice hour long conversation about all things life.
A few days ago we started talking about the phrase in the Bible that says, "Wives, submit to your husbands as to the Lord." Ephesians 5:22 The word submission has such a negative connotation, it's hard to discuss the issue without fully explaining the phrase in context.
I had a discussion with Lynsay F. a few weeks ago about this subject, but I was uninformed and I did not present the argument clearly or effectively, so that's what I would like to do now.
In order to understand the phrase completely, you must first understand three things:
- Submission is a voluntary action of ranking. You cannot force anyone to be submissive, it has to be of their own free will.
- It is about order, not value. An analogy can be found in the military. If a Sergeant of 15 years is given an order by a Lieutenant of 15 weeks the Sergeant obeys the order without question as long as it falls into the realm of the Lieutenants authority. If you ask which officer is worth more to the Army, the answer is probably the Sergeant because he has 15 years of experience, while the Lieutenant only has 15 weeks.
- It only says wives submit to your husbands. It does not say girlfriends submit to your boyfriends or women submit to men.
Going back to point #2, I believe this is what most people do not understand. If submission was about value, and the Bible says that wives submit to their husbands, and husbands submit to Jesus, and Jesus submit to God... then that implies that God is more valuable than Jesus, and we know that not to be the case. On the cross, Jesus could have ended the entire incident with a blink of the eye... but he submitted to his father's will and went through with the Crucifixion instead.
The Bible is clear when it says wives submit to their husbands, children submit to their parents, and workers submit to their employers. Even if you hate your boss or can't stand your father, you should still honor the position even if you don't honor the person.
Guys: The best predictor of future behavior is past behavior. Does she honor her parents? Does she show them respect? Show me a woman who does neither of those, and I will show you a women who will not honor or respect you as a husband.
Of course people always go to the worse case scenario. What if my husband tells me to stop breathing or go lock myself in the closet for all of eternity? Help you. Those requests are not Biblically founded, and therefore do fall under the category of being submissive.
There are two things she must be as well in order for this concept to be fully understood:
- She must be submissive to Christ. She can show this by being worshipful, prayerful, and thankful. Show me a woman who does not pray, and I will show you a woman who is not submissive to Christ.
- She must be submissive to God's purpose of marriage. His design, not yours. The world has corrupted marriage to serve its own purpose... man's version differs from God's.
The purpose of marriage according to God has two main components:
- Procreation. The raising and socializing of children.
- Illustration. Leading by example the relationship between Christ and the Church.
Everything else comes second. Happiness? God never said get married to be happy. But if you follow the two guidelines above, you will find happiness in your life.
This blog is getting kind of long, but if you are interested in this subject, I urge you to listen to Voddie Baucham's series called "Marriage by Design." Voddie is extremely knowledgeable about the subject and he'll put my arguments to shame. Go ahead, if you're still reading, click the link and watch the video. Decide for yourself!
Oh and remember men... exalt your wives. It brings honor to God and yourself. As for women... remember that men are like puppies. When they do something good raise your voice a few octaves and say, "that's a GOOD boy!" -- you'll have them trained before you know it.
PS. I wish I didn't have an H...